Governance
Clear AI rules, understood by everyone
Define your internal AI usage rules, share them, then measure whether they're truly understood.
A policy no one understands protects no one
The Québec government's guide and Law 25 expect organisations to frame AI use with clear rules. But a policy filed on an intranet, read by no one, offers no real protection. Aptia closes the loop everyone forgets: not only defining and sharing your rules, but verifying they're understood.
How it works
How it works
Start from a template
An assistant proposes an AI usage policy adapted to the Québec context.
Adapt to your reality
Adjust the rules to your sector, your tools and your risk level.
Share it
Send the policy to your teams in a few clicks, in a clear version.
Measure understanding
A short check confirms the policy is read and understood, not just sent.
What's inside
What an AI usage policy covers
Concrete rules, tied to the competencies the diagnostic assesses.
Data & confidentiality
What can, and cannot, go into an AI tool, in the sense of Law 25.
Human verification
The duty to review and validate, the antidote to hallucinations.
Approved tools & shadow AI
Which tools are allowed, and how to avoid unframed use.
Ethics & bias
The precautions for decisions with high human impact.
The difference:
measuring understanding
It's what no one else does. Because the policy is tied to the same competencies as the diagnostic, you don't just share it: you know who understood it, and where grey areas remain to clarify. A policy becomes a living measure, not a dead document.
Clear rules, understood by all
Start by measuring where your teams stand: the free diagnostic reveals the gaps your policies will need to close.
No credit card · No commitment · Confidential data